Moral Mystery

One might suppose that telling a lie could be equated to the old tree falling in the forest question in various ways. That is: If no one knows or finds out you told a lie, did it really happen? But, what if you are a federal judge like Judge Robert J. Brack and Judge Lourdes Martinez and you told lies in court and in your rulings? AND your fellow judges (and citizens) KNOW you told lies in your courtroom and in your rulings because you sided with the Status Quo defendants? Doesn't this make you a 'rapist and predator' of the peoples' rights you swore to protect?

The moral mystery is how does a federal judge justify the lies they know their fellow judges know about? Is there no shame? Obviously not. Judges Brack and Martinez are proof of shameless judges - outlaw judges. All the judges present a face of honesty and duty to the Constitutional laws of this country. They all swore an oath of allegiance "to protect and defend the Constitution." When they turn their backs on their duty they accept the immoral actions of corrupt judges. Where is their outrage that brothers and sisters of the robe dare lie and deceive and infect the federal court with their lawlessness?

When citizens and others appear in federal court for whatever reason, they expect the judge to be impartial and adjudicate justice according to the Constitution and laws of the United States.
Not playing some game while reading their bible or practicing mental reservation. Or holding courtroom conversations with the defendants about the plaintiffs.

These two should commit judges' 'hara-kiri' - resign! They are an insult to the community which, in their federal positions, extends to the borders of the whole United States.