Las Cruces: Shameful silence

The leading factions of government-involved promoters of Christian privilege in Las Cruces have reveled in the shameful rulings against the First Amendment civil liberties by Federal District Court of Las Cruces Judge Robert Brack and his minion, federal Magistrate Lourdes Martinez.
These two judges would better serve the public in traffic court, or no court, well away from deciding the rights of the people guaranteed by the First Amendment. They lied.

The triad of the City of Las Cruces, the private Greater Las Cruces Chamber of Commerce, and the Las Cruces Public Schools Board of Education, frolic under their blanket of prejudice in their status quo bed. Not to go unrecognized is the infected degreed influence from the various supporting departments of the New Mexico State University that mockingly promote 'multiculturalism' but aid and abet the LCPS and the others. Also, not to be left out are the religious factions that dictate .... . Or those who make decisions based on the 'wink and nod' of what they think their religious leaders want them to do.

The shameful silence of citizens and pulpits is a blight on the city as their silence encourages the promotion of hateful disdain toward others. There is no salvation from hate. The outcome of the lawsuits for justice was set from the beginning by the triad. Their silence proves it. As part of the plan, Judge Lourdes Martinez, in partnership with the defense lawyer, William Babington, 'lost' the Pretrial Order (PTO) for two years and for those two years denied any knowledge of her wrongdoing. Mental reservation? Job security?

Only when Judge Brack's personal Clerk of the Court, Bernadette Howell retired, did the PTO reappear.

One of the unspoken factors that influence the actions of the judges was them obviously putting their religion before their oath of office and thereby mocking the U. S. Constitution they are bound by. When judges lie and illegally promote their religion in the courthouse, chambers and courtrooms, then are relieved of their crimes by outside religious factions, only to return to their ways after penitence, our secular justice is doomed. The federal courthouse is not a church!

When citizens end up in any court for any reason, there should be no doubt that justice will be served. There have been cases where honest judges have seen a conflict between their personal beliefs or their experience and the law and recused themselves. When that happens Justice is served. Justice belongs to the people, not the four-flushers pretending to be judges.