How is it possible for a pro se non-lawyer, retired Army Infantry Captain (O-3) defeat a retired Navy JAG Corp Captain (O-6) who is still in private practice and two federal judges over the Constitutional issue of Right and Wrong? Impossible, one may conclude before reading the facts.
If one limits themselves to read only what the bought federal judges wrote to reach a stilted conclusion, then join the crowd of the ill-informed. One must read what was submitted to the court by the plaintiff in the form of motions, rebuttals, evidence, and memorandums-of-record that recorded the collusive misdeeds of the defense and the judges.
The selection and appointments of federal Judges Robert Brack and Lourdes Martinez is a prime example of the corruptness of the Bush Administration's appointing of federal judges to Federal District Courts. As the lawyers say, let their courtroom records speak for them.
One question that needs an answer is, why would a federal judge with all the authority of the bench, write a personal, camouflaged threatening letter to the plaintiff in a case before his court, about the judge's continued relationship with a former law clerk who had quit his job? Did the judge's "weekly calls" to the former law clerk reveal that the plaintiff had written the now-lawyer an informative letter, or was it the possibility of the plaintiff's mail being read?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment